Rep. Neguse Presses Trump Administration for Answers on Deteriorating Forest Service Trail Conditions

Washington, D.C. — Colorado Congressman Joe Neguse, Ranking Member of the Federal Lands Subcommittee, joined over 20 colleagues in demanding answers from the Trump Administration on deteriorating Forest Service trail conditions due to insufficient maintenance by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), which has threatened visitor safety and outdoor recreation access for millions of Americans. 

“We write with serious concern that, despite your stated intent to prioritize outdoor access and improve visitor experiences, the USFS trail maintenance operations have been hamstrung by layoffs, hiring restrictions, budget cuts and other policies that make it harder for staff to do their jobs and meet agency objectives,” the letter states. 

“The USFS manages over 164,000 miles of trails, more than any other land management agency. Americans cherish the USFS trail network, which serves 84 million visitors annually. Public lands recreation contributes $128 billion to our national economy. Despite the clear value of trails and the agency’s stated focus on outdoor access, conditions on the ground are deteriorating.”

The letter concluded: “Over the last year, we have lost skilled workers, critical staff roles and vast amounts of local knowledge. At current staffing levels and with existing challenges, USFS has concluded that ‘many [ranger] districts are unable to conduct basic trail maintenance. Front-country trails are being prioritized; backcountry trails are being abandoned. Deferred maintenance is exponentially compounding.’ Given that USFS has acknowledged these issues internally, it is imperative that our constituents understand how you plan to address the deterioration in outdoor access and better maintain trails this year.” 

Read the full letter HERE.

Rep. Neguse and his colleagues also demanded that USFS leadership answer specific questions on the agency’s plan to address the deterioration in outdoor access and better maintain trails ahead of the upcoming summer season. 

The lawmakers gave USFS until March 31, 2026, to respond to the following: 

1. How will the USFS address the issues in the report before the summer field season?

2. How will the USFS restore sufficient staffing to prevent the proliferation of “unpassable trails, unsafe bridges and negative environmental impacts” as detailed in this report?

3. We understand the USFS has recently authorized national forests to hire a limited number of seasonal temporary recreation positions, commonly referred to by the agency as 1039s. Hiring seasonal recreation staff is a positive step compared to 2025 when forests could not hire temporary seasonal trail crews and wilderness rangers, but the USFS is still limiting overall hiring. Is the agency planning to continue limiting the number of seasonal staff who can be hired regardless of the funding source for these positions?
4. If a national forest has outside grants, local funding and other non-appropriated dollars available, how does the public benefit from restricting national forests’ use of those resources to hire seasonal staff and implement on-the-ground projects?
5. The Trail Program Status Report notes that the USFS currently limits the seasons for Permanent Seasonal Employee (PSE) positions even when those staff are externally funded or responding to natural disasters. Does the USFS plan to increase flexibility around PSE positions in FY26 to better utilize its existing workforce to address the problems detailed in this report?
6. How does the USFS plan to address challenges with grant and agreements capacity so that partners and volunteers can better support agency priorities?

###